Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2016-03-09 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2016-03-09 Senate Journal Page 2063 SB 23 Message dated March 7 was read stating the House passed and returned for consideration CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 23(JUD) "An Act relating to opioid overdose drugs and to immunity for prescribing, providing, or administering opioid overdose drugs" with the following amendment: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 23(JUD) "An Act relating to the practice of pharmacy; relating to the dispensing of opioid overdose drugs by a pharmacist; relating to opioid overdose drugs and to immunity for prescribing, providing, or administering opioid overdose drugs; and providing for an effective date." (Title Change HCR 22) Senator Coghill moved that the Senate concur in the House amendment. Senator Gardner objected, then withdrew her objection. The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 23(JUD) Shall the Senate Concur in the House Amendment to CSSB 23(JUD)? Effective Date YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Dunleavy, Egan, Ellis, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, Kelly, MacKinnon, McGuire, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Stoltze, Wielechowski and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 23(JUD) "An Act relating to the practice of pharmacy; relating to the dispensing of opioid overdose drugs by a pharmacist; relating to opioid overdose drugs and to immunity for prescribing, providing, or administering opioid overdose drugs; and providing for an effective date." 2016-03-09 Senate Journal Page 2064 Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. The Secretary was requested to notify the House. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment.